Socially many people think that gay marriages are not acceptable therefore the couples should not have the right to get married. In some countries such as Canada, there is dramatic progress to acknowledge the rights of gays and lesbians. Court battles have been filed and to some extent gays and lesbians have succeeded in obtaining some degree of social recognition Staver 5. The gay movement argument for same sex marriage is basically founded on the norm of formal equality.
They argue that the state needs to accord the gays the same legal options as other different sex couples enjoy. This includes the right and duties required in civil marriage. Economic benefits that the proponents of gay marriages cite include increased revenue as a result of additional marriages through marriage taxes Stockland For a long time the culture of men and women marrying each other in the society has been established globally.
Two men or women marrying therefore have resulted to a controversy where people have differing opinions. Same sex marriages cannot have children. The debate for this issue of same sex marriage has existed for many years and a gay right movement was established in America during the s.
Getting married is a decision which is personal and private. The controversy brought by gay marriages includes changing the norm of marriage and challenges in existing laws and religious traditions. Many religions in the world object to the issue of gay marriages on the grounds of morality. Churches base on their beliefs of what is wrong or right on scriptures which are holy writings. The church believes that allowing the gay couples to adopt children would be an injustice as the children will lack the proper moral upbringing.
Opponents of gay marriages cite the increased social costs such as healthcare thus affecting the economy. Those against this kind of marriage think that same sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children. The opponents are generally concerned about the harmful effect gay marriages would have on the society in case of legalization. They believe that the family institution is protected through heterosexual marriage whose main aim is to procreate.
If a contract is not for a legal purpose, then it is not enforceable and is against the public interest in some states. However, other states stipulate that same sex marriage is a legal purpose, so those marriages should be recognized by the federal government so long as the marriage contract was entered into where it is for a legal purpose.
Doing otherwise should be against public policy. The arguments that you describe on either side should be decided on the state level.
The morality discussion will go on regardless of government action. Well, I got drafted into the army in the late '60's and since then I've been taking care of ex wives and kids. So I can't really relate. But I can say, if one female wants to experierment with another female, I don't see anything wrong with it. Guys, well, that's different. Gay guys have a problem with genetics I think. They were somehow born with too many female hormones or something like that.
My brother is gay, and has been with David for over 25 years now. I don't understand it, because he divorced a WAY hot girl named Patsy to get with this guy. Of course, she fled to me, and we had an affair for a year or so. That was back in the '80's. I don't know what is right or wrong with gay, but I know that when wars are going to occur, like 20 years down the road, the male birth rate increases huge.
Like God already knows when we need more men for battle. It sounds crazy, but it is recorded history. Gay marriage should be illegal. It is disgusting and immoral. Why can't we go back to when times were good. Before gay marriage was illegal, and so was corporal punishment.
There was less trouble and children obeyed their parents. Gay marriage is disgusting and know one wants to see it. As for your conclusion i love it and thank you for assisting me with mine!
The practice of homosexuality is destructive to the human soul. What is the Goal? I hope that those who have read this are willing to consider the following steps: While some gay-marriage-affirming arguments do minimize the continuing value of some Bible passages, that doesn't mean all of us think that way. I hope you can see why we think it is possible to support gay marriage from a Biblical position, even if you don't agree. Realize that the situation is not as simple as you may have understood from your upbringing and cultural surroundings.
Hold your personal opinions, but realize that there are other options. Maybe think carefully about the downsides to NOT affirming.
Pay attention to the conversations and stories from gay Christians. Listen first — and maybe end with listening for now as well. Your friend doesn't need to hear another person explain the traditional condemning interpretation from the Bible.
They've heard it before. Listen with your heart, not your head, for a while. Support equal rights and affirm human dignity. Even if you don't agree personally, maybe you could still support civil rights and equal access to protection under the law that we as heterosexual couples receive. Why Gay Marriage Though? Very briefly, here are a few things to consider if you're not sure about this answer: Marriage in general is being seen as less relevant or sacred by much of our society today, and certainly treated that way in practice by much of our church itself, looking at divorce rates.
Shouldn't we welcome those who are eager to enter into the institution? Gay marriage gives our gay Christian friends good role models of how to be gay, follow Christ, and have a healthy family relationship too. It's a sign of equality before God, as humans. Limiting it to "heterosexual couples only" implicitly denies equality. Access to marriage gives equal access to legal, political, and family rights. We've already seen many changes in the institution of marriage in recorded history: Divorces were given for any reason by the man in Jesus' time but not woman , and often because there were no children.
Marriages have been seen as primarily economic and political transactions in many cultures through the centuries. Arranged marriages have been the norm for most people in the world. American slaves were encouraged to marry, but were not given legal status and the marriages and children were often ignored when buying and selling.
Appeals to tradition and the Bible were often central in arguments against interracial marriage.
This Argumentative essay will discuss about the argument of same sex marriage. The contents are: meaning, brief background and thesis statement for the Introduction; for the Body of the discussion is the counter argument; and for the conclusion part: the summary and the restatement of .
Free Essay: While many people oppose same-sex marriage, there are really no valid reasons against it. If your daughter told you she wanted to marry another.
Gay marriage is also referred to as same sex marriage. Same sex relationships occur when men and women are attracted to someone of the same gender as themselves. Gay Marriage Essay / Research Paper Example. June 23, Conclusion. In conclusion, issue of same sex marriage has raised many debates for many years. Same sex marriages have some. Same sex marriage essays conclusion but stopping same sex marriage is basically stopping conclusion on homosexuality them from harleos.cf same sex marriage essays conclusion same sex marriage persuasive essay conclusion, same sex marriage .
Free Same Sex Marriage papers, essays, and research papers. This free Sociology essay on Essay: Same sex marriage is perfect for Sociology students to use as an example.