We count, among these observations, the simple fact that most beings cherish their life, so much so that they are willing to persevere through horrendous conditions to preserve it. We may also count the simple fact that life is a rewarding experience, and that for all its misery, there remains tremendous joy, the joy we actively strive to achieve.
As an aside, non-existence is a misery of its own, for it neither provides comfort, nor ever the relief of tribulation overcome. An objection arises in that, if suffering is the ultimate evil, then we should eliminate suffering entirely. And since the only option presently available to achieve this end appears the extermination of all life, including human life, such an objection defies our foremost moral sensibilities. Moreover, this objection tacitly assumes that neither nature could create nor could man ever synthesize beings which, though capable of suffering, cannot process such suffering, i.
From these considerations arises not only the conviction that we should respect the right to life of beings, but also ensure that humans thrive via the optimization of our competing variables. It stands to reason, that, in general, forsaking a child to nothingness, denying him life in all its wondrous complexity, is a grave evil for which, even as a profoundly anti-religious man, I believe we should repent 2.
The RMF board election has been counted! Check out the results. This essay is an original work by -- Animalian talk It does not necessarily reflect the views expressed in RationalWiki's Mission Statement , but we welcome discussion of a broad range of ideas.
Feel free to make comments on the talk page , which will probably be far more interesting, and might reflect a broader range of RationalWiki editors' thoughts. Retrieved from " https: Views Read Edit Fossil record.
Community Saloon bar To do list What is going on? External links Twitter Facebook Discord. This page was last modified on 5 March , at Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by RationalWiki: For concerns on copyright infringement please see: Although the sentences sounded both innocuous and unpretentious, they were neither.
It overturned state laws that protected the unborn and has resulted in over 30 million abortions roughly the population of Canada in the United States. The decision also seems unpretentious by acknowledging that it did not know when life begins. A crucial role of government is to protect life. Government cannot remove a segment of the human population from its protection without adequate justification.
The burden of proof should lie with the life-taker, and the benefit of the doubt should be with the life-saver. The burden of proof in law is on the prosecution. The benefit of doubt is with the defense. This is also known as a presumption of innocence. The defendant is assumed to be innocent unless proven guilty. Again the burden of proof is on the entity that would take away life or liberty. The benefit of the doubt lies with the defense.
The Supreme Court clearly stated that it does not know when life begins and then violated the very spirit of this legal principle by acting as if it just proved that no life existed in the womb.
Even more curious was the fact that to do so, it had to ignore the religious community and international community on the subject of the unborn. Had the religious community really failed to reach a consensus? Although there were some intramural disagreements, certainly the weight of evidence indicated that a Western culture founded on Judeo-Christian values held abortion to be morally wrong. People with widely divergent theological perspectives Jewish, Catholic, evangelical and fundamental Protestants shared a common agreement about the humanity of the unborn.
The same could be said about the international legal community. The unborn were protected by various international documents like the Declaration of Geneva and the U. Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Just as there are solid medical arguments against abortion, so also there are legal arguments against abortion. Wade was a bad decision that needs to be overturned. A third set of arguments against abortion would be philosophical arguments. A key philosophical question is where do you draw the line?
Put another way, when does a human being become a person? Wade separated personhood from humanity. In other words, the judges argued that a developing fetus was a human i. Since only persons are given 14th Amendment protection under the Constitution, the Court argued that abortion could be legal at certain times. This left to doctors, parents, or even other judges the responsibility of arbitrarily deciding when personhood should be awarded to human beings. Once the Court allowed people to start drawing lines, some drew them in unexpected ways and effectively opened the door for infanticide and euthanasia.
In the past, such criteria as implantation or quickening had been suggested. The Court chose the idea of viability and allowed for the possibility that states could outlaw abortions performed after a child was viable.
But viability was an arbitrary criterion, and there was no biological reason why the line had to be drawn near the early stages of development. The line, for example, could be drawn much later. Ethicist Paul Ramsey frequently warned that any argument for abortion could logically be also used as an argument for infanticide. As if to illustrate this, Dr. Francis Crick, of DNA fame, demonstrated that he was less concerned about the ethics of such logical extensions and proposed a more radical definition of personhood.
Other line-drawers have suggested a cultural criterion for personhood. It is also an argument for infanticide. More recently some line-drawers have focused on a mental criterion for personhood. In conclusion, we can see that there are many good arguments against abortion.
Obviously there are a number of biblical arguments against abortion. But there are also medical, legal, and philosophical arguments against abortion. The Bible and logic are on the side of the Christian who wants to stand for the sanctity of human life. Note from Kerby Anderson: So many people ask for more information on abortion; I suggest you check out the Abortion Facts Web site at www.
In my "Introduction to Ethics" class, the topic for the night was abortion. As the discussion progressed, people all around me were saying that an abortion is good to do…. A Commitment to Gruesomeness This year is the twenty-seventh year of legal abortion, and the only thing that appears to have changed in the debate is the addition of newer….
Sue Bohlin takes a hard look at abortion from a biblical perspective. Dear Sue, I just read your article on abortion as a source to prepare a message on abortion. Thank you for a well written, well documented work. Sue Bohlin looks at the common effects of an abortion on the women who choose it. From a biblical worldview perspective, it is not surprising that many women experience guilt,…. The grisly effects of over twenty years of an abortion industry in this country are becoming easier to document all the time.
In Pennsylvania, the "anatomy specialist" for The International…. Kerby Anderson is president of Probe Ministries International.
He holds masters degrees from Yale University science and from Georgetown University government. His new series with Harvest House Publishers includes: When a woman gets pregnant, it is usually a result of her own choices, even if the pregnancy is unwanted or unplanned. The most obvious reason why I think that abortion is immoral is because it is the intentional killing of a human being.
It is a well-known fact that life begins at the moment of conception. If it is murder to kill a human being in any stage of life, then abortion, the murder of the fetus, is obviously wrong, because murder is one of the ethical absolutes.
When we perform an abortion, we take the life of an innocent child. We deny the unborn child its right to live and experience the world. No one has thee right to take the life of another person, even an unborn child.
Persuasive essay against abortion - here the author should encompass as many as possible of reasons, ideas and research to make a comprehensive analysis of the negative aspects only; Abortion pro-choice essay - shows to the readers some of the ideas why, in certain cases, pregnancy terminating might .
The word abortion by definition means the induced expulsion of a fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently. Abortion is an extremely controversial issue because while some people are completely against it, others believe that a woman should have the right to choose. I believe /5(9).
Essay about Being for and Against Abortion. For and Against Abortion There are many topics that most people are for and against which is I guess a normal reaction to some things. One of the most controversial topics would be abortion. Essay about A Case Against Abortion - Every unborn child has the right to live, so why do people complete an abortion and kill the unborn baby. An abortion is very dangerous for a woman health, it is immoral, and punishes an innocent people.
The Argument of Abortion - Philosophy Essay The Argument of Abortion - Philosophy Essay In On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, Mary Anne Warren discusses a few arguments against abortion, namely bringing into play whether the fetus is actually a person, or “not a . An Argument Against Abortion Essay Words | 5 Pages. Abortion in America is a controversial issue in which both sides have valid arguments at face value.